A few questions I’m confused about from a class

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #10154
      Adamn86
      Participant

      First:

      if you have a blood type that was an ambiguous phenotype, how would you go about finding out what your genotype was?

      Second:

      suppose this situation: You are called in to testify in a court case of disputed parentage and you choose to use the MN blood system to establish paternity. In this sytem, the alleles M and N are codominant. Legal proceedings dictate that evidence be presented indicated who CANNOT be the father.

      a) suppose the mother and the child both have the type N blood, the husband has type MN, and the alleged father has type N. What would you advise the court, and why?

      b)suppose the mother and the child both have type N blood, the husband has by M, and the alleged father has type MN. Now what would you advise the court, and why?

      These are the two questions I am totally stumped on in my anthropology course, I cannot figure it out!

    • #86067
      mith
      Participant

      whats ambiguous phenotype?

    • #86069
      Adamn86
      Participant

      I think a phenotype which doesn’t somehow manifest itself? I have no clue.

    • #86075
      mith
      Participant

      I think the definition of phenotype is that it is observable. I don’t know why it would be ambiguous.

    • #86106
      stopherlogic
      Participant

      Is it not as simple as because both husband and alleged father have at least one N allele the parentage is still disputable for A.
      If this is correct you can probably work out B.

    • #86124
      Qujibo
      Participant

      a) If they are codominant then you know that the mother has two genes coding for N, the son has two genes coding for N which means that he would have received a N from his father. From this information there is No way to tell that the alleged father cannot be the father. In fact if you construct a punnet square (not really necessary for just a F1 generation cross) you can see that there is actually a 50% chance that the husband is not the father.

      b) In this case you can clearly see that the husband is clearly not the father, As N and M are not dominant or recessive the child can only receive the other N from a father who is a carrier of the Gene, as the husband does not carry the N gene it is not possible for him to be the father.

      As for the first question give a little more specification as to how the phenotype is ambitious?

    • #86822
      danni1708
      Participant

      hey 🙂
      i think from reading question A
      that the alleged father wuld be the biological father..
      as the blood type MN has the codominant alleles M and N, for an offspring with MN both genes wuld need to be present in the formation of the gametes
      im not sure if this has helped at all..
      xoxox

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.