Evolution not supported by the facts

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #16158
      oCShxckzZ
      Participant

      http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

      Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.

    • #109921
      canalon
      Participant

      By what? The intense cherry picking? The absence of scientific reference, only anecdotes? The absence of context in your quotes? The brain melting absence of anything of interest in that blog?

    • #109923
      ughaibu
      Participant
      quote oCShxckzZ:

      http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

      Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.

      Evolution is observed to occur, this means that there is a fact of evolution. Within that fact, various phenomena of evolution are observed to occur, so there are facts of evolution. Accordingly, it’s difficult to make sense of your title for this thread. If you mean that there is some specific theory of evolution which isn’t supported by the facts of evolution, then you’ll need to be clear about which theory that is and explain what you mean by it not being supported. Remember, theories of evolution are not conjectures of fact, they’re explanatory models.

    • #109976
      Luxorien
      Participant

      I see your Chick tract and raise you a talk.origins FAQ:

      http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ce/3/part12.html

    • #109990
      keeblur
      Participant

      "Equipping Christians for evangelism" pretty much throws any reasoning out the door.

    • #110311
      Gar
      Participant

      I can’t believe that people still try to deny natural selection. It is literally unbelievable.

    • #110398
      marquitosgm
      Participant

      have you read this one?

      On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life? By Ch. Darwin (1859)

      Pure beauty.

    • #110499
      Jonl1408
      Participant

      I would make a correction to the heading… "Proof" doesn’t support the theory of Evolution. Facts can be interpreted wrongly, to mean anything you want them to. Proof is when the facts actually conclusively prove something.

    • #114703
      RabbitPhilosopher
      Participant
      quote oCShxckzZ:

      http://www.chick.com/bc/1987/evolution.asp

      Read this, you evolutionists (hopefully) will be surprised.

      The link you provide contains nothing but garden-variety objections to evolution based on gross misconceptions, ignorance and dishonesty. A user above even provided a link to talkorigins where they easily demolish the first three paragraphs of the article, they basically show the evolution deniers at chick.com are attempting to dupe their own readers with dishonesty. The rest of the article is equally laughable.

      I will point out that chick.com is the website for Chick Publications (they publish the seemingly ubiquitous "This Was Your Life!" pamphlet) which is designated a hate group (yes a HATE group) by the Southern Poverty Law Group, http://www.splcenter.org/node/105/activegroups .

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.