December 30, 2007 at 8:37 am #8884nchowlahParticipant
hello, i need help in picking a microscope. I want to be able to see ribosomes, ER and other organelles in action. i dodnt want a microscope that just shoes a membrane of a cell or just structure. something like this http://youtube.com/watch?v=WAjeMV4Lkmw&feature=related
i just need the magnification level. -Thank you!
December 30, 2007 at 11:39 am #80125seasquirtParticipant
You will not be able to see ribosomes or ER without an electron microscope as the resolution power of the light microscope is too low. You will be able to get images such as the amoeba you saw on the clip with a x1000 light microscope. With oil immersion, you can get the finest detail.
December 30, 2007 at 3:47 pm #80131mithParticipant
On an unrelated note, they’re supposed to be building some sort of hyperlense microscope recently
January 4, 2008 at 11:30 am #80266mcarParticipant
There are several light microscopes where you may view organelles in action, and therefore that the cell must be alive then.
Fluoroscopy uses fluorophores but some could affect or kill cells.
January 5, 2008 at 1:43 pm #80294DarbyParticipant
Light microscopes hit a resolution limit from the nature of the light itself that would hide most organelles. However, some computer manipulation originally used in satellite systems can increase the resolution to some extent.
But another problem is, how would you see the organelles? In preserved cells, stains can make different organelles show up, but there are very few stains that aren’t toxic to living cells. And even if you found a non-toxic stain for your organelles, the stain would have to chemically bond to the organelle, and how could you be sure that the organelles are then behaving normally?
January 5, 2008 at 7:21 pm #80301MrMisteryParticipant
if you want to see individual ribosomes you will need an electron microscope and nothing short of that. But you will be able to see other organelles with a florescence microscope for example(each organelle will produce an individual color when hit with a certain wavelength). with phase contrast microscopy you will be able to see individual nuclei(after you remove them from the cells).
January 6, 2008 at 3:08 am #80308canalonParticipant
The use of fluorescence requires both specific probes and a specific microscope (my lab has this one but it is on the expensive side…) with external light box and specific filter. All of that ends up very expensive.
You can see nuclei and some structure without staining using differential interference contrast or DIC (see here) but you will need a specific condenser. I suspect that this film used that technique, but I am no specialist.
January 6, 2008 at 10:19 am #80318MrMisteryParticipant
there is a fluorescence microscope at the university of bucharest which i have used. it’s quite ok, and probably affordable for a lab.
May 30, 2008 at 10:58 am #84355DoctorSteinParticipantquote mith:
Wow hyperlense!! It’s great! How’s the magnification?
June 28, 2008 at 5:49 pm #84799Ken RamosParticipant
There are many ways of which one can observe some specific organelles utilizing a light microscope. Phase contast is one and DIC another and of course there is staining and that can be quite complicated at times depending on the subject and stains being employed for specific cell structure. Mostly I observe protozoa and I have found circular oblique lighting to be a very cheap and effective means of observing a good many of the organelles contained in these tiny animals. Poor mans DIC, I refer to it or COL. More can be found out about it if you Google it or go to the website photomacrography.net and look under the microscope and technical forums. This site is a goldmine of information concerning microscopy and extreme close in photography. If you have not a microscope just yet and can afford a relatively good one, might I suggest the Zeiss Axiostar with CP (clinical plan achromats) or A-Plan objectives with a good 100X oil immersion objective. A bit of advice though, though it is quite cheaper than the Axiostar Plus, which at the time I purchased my Axiostar it was many times cheaper than today, stay away from the Zeiss Primostar, Chinese manufactured with extremely poor quality control. Probably full of lead too… 😆
August 9, 2008 at 6:15 am #85428juliana29Participant
The electron microscope has several hundred times the resolving power of
the light microscope.
December 25, 2011 at 5:54 pm #108850SubrakParticipant
Sorry to bump such an old thread – but I’m gonna bump it anyway 😛
I’m a Student – and I’ve decided to try and obtain a "Good" non-£00000 microscope for home study.
I’m currently looking at this: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mueller-MTX-3 … 582wt_1189
Does anyone feel like giving me some tips? I’d be really appreciative for some real advice so I don’t end up wasting any money. My budget is £400 or under – but I’m really hoping I can get a good one with this amount!
December 25, 2011 at 8:07 pm #108852SubrakParticipant
Just realized I wasn’t very descriptive with my request – What was quite silly!
I’m looking for a Binocular Microscope for viewing living, and stained cells.
Can anyone recommend any good brand-names for this type of equipment?
Thanks for reading!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.