Biology Forum › Molecular Biology › D and L isomers of monosachrides
- AuthorPosts
- April 4, 2006 at 4:12 pm #4320
Mjhavok
ParticipantWhat are the nutritional and health implications of using D and L isomers of monosaccharides.
- April 4, 2006 at 6:46 pm #45133
Trev
ParticipantI believe, it`s not important. Because our ferments cut only bonds. D and L – are only orientation of molecules.
- April 8, 2006 at 7:59 pm #45446
Ultrashogun
ParticipantI think L sugars wouldnt work due to stereospecifity of enzyms.
- April 9, 2006 at 12:02 pm #45479
victor
Participantquote Ultrashogun:I think L sugars wouldnt work due to stereospecifity of enzyms.Yup, you got it right shogun….our sugar hydrolysis enzymes are stereospecific to it’s substrate which is D-glucose. And usually, sugar like glucose are oftenly in it’s natural form which is in D-form. Beside, our tongue also has a stereospecific pappilae which interprate ‘sweet’ as we taste D-glucose and interpretate ‘bitter’ as we taste L-glucose…:lol:
I you wanna know more about sugar (generally carbohydrate), I suggest you better hurry get your organic chemistry book and open stereochemistry chapter….(that’s or the beginning.. 😆 )
- April 9, 2006 at 4:17 pm #45512
Ultrashogun
ParticipantIs there any harm in ingesting L-isomers?
I ask that because I read somewhere, that many pharmacological substances, advil for example, are actually racemic and that not only is one isomer not active, but also inhibits and thus delays the effect by some time.
Im thinking this because you say that L sugars taste bitter, and bitter is usually a taste which would cause an animal to stop consumption.
- April 9, 2006 at 5:52 pm #45522
Mjhavok
ParticipantFor instance the enzyme permease I have read is very stereospecific.
Thanks for the input guys.
- April 11, 2006 at 6:21 am #45641
victor
Participantwhat we consume is sucrose isn’t it? and we know that sucroce is racemic, so, there’s no bitter taste or anything..:lol:
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.