Polls are enabled…

And I would have voted an old racist who probably enjoys making controversial statement (makes publicity), and whose controversial statement will always be blown up by the media. But a nobel prize is an award for wonderful acomplishments and certainly not a proof of universal competence as many laureatees have proved…

From what I read he basically saud that anybody who has worked with black people knows that they arent as well adapted to a working environment. I personally dont have any experience with this, but Ive heard the same thing on many independent accounts.

Well the availability heuristic isn’t very scientific is it?

I figure he has freedom of speech like everyone else. Although I also think that as a scientist, if he were wanting to make such a claim he should produce evidence to support it. Seriously, if you are going to say something that controversial you’d better have proof. I guess the same would go for Farakahn though when he says us whities were the result of experiments by evil mad black scientists. I’d love to see the evidence for that!

Seems to me this is only a big deal because of who he is. A lot of people think that way and this should not be a shock. It only really matters how the man acts on the belief. Maybe publicly stating that blacks are not as intelligent as whites was not such a fantastic idea, but he’s only human. If he has reason, then what’s the problem? And I hate to say this because I am honestly not racist, and I don’t think it’s blacks to whites as more as it’s Africans to ‘Westerners’ but we are smarter, and that’s really as a whole rather than parts of africa because I most certainly am not saying that EVERYONE in Africa is uneducated. Really it’s because Western civilization is more technologically advanced.
Does that make sense?

Education is not a measure of intelligence. If it was, the kalahari bushmen would think you’re dumb for not knowing how to find water in a desert.

In fact the "intelligence quotient" is not really an intelligence measure either. Read Gould’s Measure of Man to get more details on how various tests are biased towards literacy(in english).

Nicely put Mith, I could not reply as I was reeling in pain from biting my lip.

Okay, not unintelligent per se, but not um, modern? Not exactly stupid, because yes they do have there own measure of intelligence in their culture, but really kind of uncivilized.

Let me put it this way Jones, if you put a baby from Africa into a family of Westerners, would the baby become "modern" and "civilized"? Or do you believe there is something inherently genetic that prevents them from being so.

More specifically, do you believe Angelina Jolie’s kids will be unable to cope with computers?

Would it be wrong for me to ref this link?

http://almaz.com/nobel/peace/2004a.html

I totally agree. Freedom of speech does also bring with it responsibility of speech. All I’m saying is that if he wants to say Un-PC things and has good scientific proof/evidence to support his claim this it would be one thing. However, I just don’t think he had any proof which just makes this another case of "open mouth, insert foot".

Aren’t Asians supposed to be the most intelligent race?

http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=26935

Oh come on! A little racist humor can be fun! So long as it’s kept humorous and not serious.

I never said that people in africa are born stupid, that would be rediculous. It’s very possible that a child born to a black couple in a tribe in africa and for some reason had to be adopted by a couple in san diego could very easily grow up to be modern and civilized. People don’t have instincts like animals do, the way a person is raised has everything to do with how they end up.

Alex made a funny. lol.

I’m not all serious and solemn, you know. 😉

http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/b … s_gladwell

I think everyone should read this article before any further comments(on the topic).

Yeah, I know you’re not. 🙂